收藏本站
《Contemporary Social Sciences》 2016年02期
收藏 | 投稿 | 手机打开
二维码
手机客户端打开本文

On the Historiographical Reform of General History of Chinese Science and Technologyin the Post-Needham Era

Liu Shengli  
【摘要】:The research of General History of Chinese Science and Technology(GHCST) has so far failed to transcend the"positivist history", a program of historiography initiated by Joseph Needham. The historians after Needham have made important explorations on the historiographical reform of GHCST. However, nearly all of these explorations are still the methodological reflections of the positivist history perspective, failing to reflect metaphysically on such historiographical presuppositions as views of science, technology and history, which means they have failed to break away from the positivist history perspective. To go beyond the limitations of positivist history calls for the introduction of the perspective of phenomenology of body and reflecting on and criticizing the historiographical presuppositions of positivist history on a metaphysical level. Such reflection will lead us to a new program of historiography in the post-Needham era, that is"phenomenal history"or the GHCST from the perspective of the phenomenology of body.

手机知网App
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前2条
1 Liu Shengli;;On the Historiographical Reform of General History of Chinese Science and Technologyin the Post-Needham Era[J];Contemporary Social Sciences;2016年02期
2 Mu-ming Poo;;Scientific leap-forward in the critical period:the thirteenth Five-Year Plan of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)[J];National Science Review;2016年04期
中国知网广告投放
 快捷付款方式  订购知网充值卡  订购热线  帮助中心
  • 400-819-9993
  • 010-62791813
  • 010-62985026